Lessons Learned from Apple v. Samsung Patent Infringement Case: Shannon Vittengl Authors Article in New Hampshire Business Review

Pierce Atwood patent counsel Shannon Vittengl discusses the recent Apple v. Samsung case and its large jury verdict based largely on the claim that Samsung had infringed on Apple’s design patents.

Shannon explains the difference between design and utility patents, the significant aspects of the examination process at the US Patent Office, and the key facts and takeaways from the nearly $540 million jury verdict in this case.

Please visit New Hampshire Business Review to read the complete article.